Arguing about Metaethics is a comprehensive contemporary collection of influential readings in metaethics today. Lucid introductions from the editors contextualise each section, making this the most up-to-date and useful anthology for the study of Metaethics at undergraduate and postgraduate level.

Arguing about Metaethics collects together some of the most exciting contemporary work in metaethics in one handy volume. In it, many of the most influential philosophers in the field discuss key questions in metaethics:
Do moral properties exist?
If they do, how do they fit into the world as science conceives it?
If they dona (TM)t exist, then how should we understand moral thought and language?
What is the relation between moral judgement and motivation?
As well as these questions, this volume discusses a wide range of issues including moral objectivity, truth and moral judgements, moral psychology, thick evaluative concepts and moral relativism.
The editors provide lucid introductions to each of the eleven themed sections in which they show how the debate lies and outline the arguments of the papers. Arguing about Metaethics is an ideal resource text for students at upper undergraduate or postgraduate level.

'In recent years, metaethics has been one of the most exciting growth areas in philosophy. This volume contains the most comprehensive and up-to-date set of readings currently available, and will be valued by advanced undergraduates, postgraduates, and professionals with interests in recent and contemporary metaethics.' - Alex Miller, University of Birmingham, UK